Home About us Editorial board Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 354-361
 

Meta-analysis on clinicopathologic risk factors of leukoplakias undergoing malignant transformation


1 Private Dental Practitioner, Coles Road, Frazer Town, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission12-Jun-2015
Date of Acceptance29-Jul-2016
Date of Web Publication21-Sep-2016

Correspondence Address:
S Shilpashree
Department of Oral Pathology, The Oxford Dental College and Hospital, Bommanahalli, Bengaluru - 560 068, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-029X.190900

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Context: Leukoplakia is classified under the term potentially malignant disorder. This term does not suggest the clinician or the patient about the severity of the disease to undergo a malignant transformation. Thus, there arises a need to identify the risk factors associated with malignant transformation (MT) to predict it at the earliest.
Aims: To generate evidence regarding the clinicopathologic factors affecting MT in oral leukoplakias.
Materials and Methods: Meta-analysis was done by extracting data from all the previous studies published. Articles were searched in PubMed databases.
Statistical Analysis: Mixed model by using the PROC MIXED (SAS 9.3) was performed to estimate the effect of different factors such as gender, type of habit (smoking tobacco, gutka, paan (with tobacco) and no habit association), clinical type and histopathology on MT. The lower specific mean for MT was also calculated with respect to the above-mentioned factors.
Results: Speckled leukoplakias also known as erythroleukoplakia confirmed to be at the highest risk. Lateral border of the tongue followed by gingiva, buccal mucosa, floor of the mouth, lesions involving tongue and floor of mouth showed increased risk. Smoking tobacco (cigarette and bidi) and idiopathic leukoplakia (without habit) carried almost equal risk. Gender had minimal influence on MT. Histopathologic correlation of grades showed an insignificant bearing on MT.
Conclusion: The carcinogenic transformation of a preexisting lesion (leukoplakia) is multifactorial and patient specific. The protocol to delineate a high-risk lesion should include the clinical type and site.


Keywords: Epithelial dysplasia, malignant transformation, oral leukoplakia, speckled leukoplakia, tobacco, tongue


How to cite this article:
Narayan T V, Shilpashree S. Meta-analysis on clinicopathologic risk factors of leukoplakias undergoing malignant transformation. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2016;20:354-61

How to cite this URL:
Narayan T V, Shilpashree S. Meta-analysis on clinicopathologic risk factors of leukoplakias undergoing malignant transformation. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2017 Mar 28];20:354-61. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2016/20/3/354/190900



   Introduction Top


Oral precancerous lesions have been a subject of controversy ever since the term was introduced. They were defined as morphologically altered tissues in which cancer is more likely to occur than its apparently normal counterpart. [1] This group included leukoplakia, erythroplakia, lichen planus and palatal keratosis. Studies done later confirmed that not all precancerous lesions transformed into malignancy and some regressed after the cessation of habit. [2],[3],[4] Thus, a new term potentially malignant disorders was introduced. However, this term does not imply to the patient nor the clinician about the severity of the risk of malignant transformation (MT) as it again includes lesions of differing risk with erythroplakia 14%, leukoplakia 0.3-17.5% and palatal lesions in reverse smoking 0.3% being the least. [2],[5],[6],[7]

Oral leukoplakia is one of the most common lesions classified under the heading "Potentially malignant disorder" and is graded histologically as mild, moderate and severe dysplasia depending on the level of involvement of the epithelium by the WHO. The main purpose behind grading dysplasia was to predict and possibly prevent MT. However, a majority of studies have been unable to conclusively predict MT on the basis of grading dysplasia. [6],[8],[9] Thus, there arises a need to identify the risk factors associated with MT to predict it at the earliest.

The aim of the present study was to generate evidence regarding the clinicopathologic risk factors of leukoplakias undergoing MT by conducting a meta-analysis of the observational studies on leukoplakia.


   Materials and methods Top


As per the guidelines of the meta-analysis of the observational studies in epidemiology, a search was conducted in PubMed database. The search term included oral leukoplakia, dysplasia and potentially malignant disorders. Each of these terms was again combined with the terms observational studies, follow-up studies, clinicopathologic studies and outcome. Reference list of the obtained studies and personal reference lists were also searched manually.

Selection criteria

Studies which confirmed diagnosis of dysplasia histologically were included in the review. For multiple publications from the same patient group, the longest follow-up period was considered. The cross-sectional studies of dysplasia were excluded and also cases which showed carcinoma changes at the initial biopsy or within 3 months of diagnosis was excluded as many authors were of the opinion that these lesions could be cancer at the initial biopsy, and the sample might have been from a nonrepresentative site. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakias were also excluded. Due to a limited number of follow-up/observational studies, we also extracted data of the follow-up cases in studies where conservative treatment was performed.

Data extraction

The following data were extracted: Gender of the patients; type of habit association (tobacco smoking [TS], bidi, cigarette--in some studies bidi habit was mentioned specifically so it was taken as a separate group, tobacco chewing [TC]--gutka, pan [with tobacco], TS + TC, nonhabit--when there was no history of habit association [idiopathic leukoplakia], in some studies tobacco with pan was mentioned without mentioning the form of tobacco whether chewed or smoked, so it was taken as tobacco and pan); site-few studies mentioned the exact location of the lesion, whereas a few combined different site, so it was taken as it is; type of leukoplakia; histopathologic grade of dysplasia; time at which MT took place after initial biopsy and the rate of MT. While extracting data on the type, we noticed that some studies had not specifically mentioned the type of nonhomogenous leukoplakias, so they were included under combined nonhomogenous group which may be any type of nonhomogenous leukoplakia.

When extracting data on histopathologic grades, we noticed that there was no uniformity in grading, a number of studies did not grade dysplasia, and therefore they were included under combined/ungraded dysplasia. Few studies clubbed mild and moderate, few other moderate and severe, so they were included in the same way.

Statistics

Mixed model by using the PROC MIXED (SAS 9.3) (SAS 1976) was performed to estimate the effect of each of the above-mentioned factors on MT of leukoplakia. The lower specific mean for MT was also calculated with respect to the above-mentioned factors.

The model fit was done taking study as random effect as follows:

Y ij = B 0 + B1Xij + B 2 Xij 2 + S i + b i ⃰ X ij + € ij

Where i = 1-13 studies

J = 1 to n1 values, B 0 + B1Xij + B 2 Xij 2 is fixed effect part of the model and S i + b i ⃰ X ij + € ij is random effect part of the model. PROC MIXED as implemented in the version of 9.3 S.A.S was used.


   Results Top


The meta-analysis comprised a total of 13 studies starting from 1975 to 2009. One fact that stood out was that there was no uniformity in reporting of cases in terms of habit history, site, type and grade of dysplasia.

A correlation of gender with MT rate showed minimal or no difference. However, there was a trend toward female predilection [Table 1] and [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Effect of gender on malignant transformation

Click here to view
Table 1: Comparing gender with malignant transformation


Click here to view


When habit association and MT rate were compared, smoking had the highest risk, followed by no habit history, tobacco and pan, chewing tobacco, pan, bidi smoking, smoking and chewing tobacco [Table 2] and [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Effect of habit on malignant transformation

Click here to view
Table 2: Data comparing habit with malignant transformation


Click here to view


On correlating site of the lesions with MT, we noticed that lateral border of tongue had the greatest risk followed by gingiva; buccal mucosa; floor of the mouth; lesions involving tongue and floor of mouth; palate; lip; mandibular ridge and mucobuccal fold; maxillary ridge and mucobuccal fold [Table 3], [Table 4] and [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Effect of sites on malignant transformation

Click here to view
Table 3: Comparing single site with malignant transformation


Click here to view
Table 4: Comparing multiple sites with malignant transformation


Click here to view


Speckled leukoplakias demonstrated utmost risk for MT followed by combined nonhomogenous, nodular, homogenous, verrucous and ulcerated type of leukoplakia [Table 5] and [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Effect of clinical type on malignant transformation

Click here to view
Table 5: Comparing clinical type with malignant transformation


Click here to view


Histopathologic correlation of grades showed that hyperkeratosis without dysplasia had the maximum risk of MT followed by ungraded dysplasia, moderate dysplasia, severe dysplasia, mild dysplasia, verrucous hyperplasia without dysplasia, moderate + severe dysplasia and mild + moderate dysplasia.[Table 6] and [Figure 5].
Figure 5: Effect of histopathology on malignant transformation

Click here to view
Table 6: Data comparing histopathology with malignant transformation


Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Precancerous lesion and precancerous condition were proposed by the WHO in 1978, wherein the term precancer in itself suggested a clinical presentation that may have a tendency to develop cancer. [10] This conveyed that carcinogenesis is a two-step or multistep process. Later, studies done by Gupta et al. in 1980, Silverman et al. in 1984 and Schepman et al. in 1998 revealed that not all lesions having dysplasias developed cancer, suggesting that it is patient specific. [2],[7],[11] Further studies suggested that cancer may develop in the contralateral or any other apparently normal mucosa. [12]

A recent consensus thus proposed a new term "potentially malignant disorder" in the place of precancer. The consensus was of the opinion that not all lesions and conditions described under the term precancer may transform to cancer, rather that there is a family of morphological alterations among which some may have an increased potential for MT. [10] However, term potentially malignant disorder fails to subclassify lesions that have an increased potential for MT among the group. The term is more generalized, including in its gamut reticular lichen planus having a negligible tendency when compared to erythroplakia which has a higher tendency for MT. Thus, the term neither completely suggests to the clinician nor the patient about the severity of the disease or its MT potential.

Warnakulasuriya et al. in 2007 proposed that the term leukoplakia should be used to recognize white plaques of questionable risk having excluded (other) known diseases or disorders that carry no increased risk for cancer. [10] This definition too does not suggest which lesions exactly have to be excluded whether it is erosive lichen planus or nodular leukoplakia.

Thus, there arises a need to clinically and/or histologically identify lesions that have an increased risk for MT so as to caution the patient and the clinician about the severity of the disease process. Hence, a meta-analysis was conducted to identify features of the lesions that underwent MT.

Gender association with MT did not show a major difference, but there was a trend toward female association, especially in nonhabit associated cases, which is in agreement with other studies. [7],[13]

It is generally accepted that tobacco in any form is carcinogenic. Our study revealed that smoking tobacco and nonhabit association carries relatively equal risk for MT followed by other forms of tobacco such as gutka and pan (with tobacco) which is in agreement with previous studies. [7],[9],[11],[13]

Next, when we focused on the risk of a specific site to undergo MT, we noted that lateral border of the tongue followed by gingiva had the highest tendency for MT. The transformation time for tongue lesions was the least with an average 6.4 years when compared to other sites which is similar to previous studies. We believe that nonkeratinized lateral border of tongue and dentogingival junction show an increased turnover rate and are subjected to mechanical trauma, microbial biofilm formation, along with superimposed tobacco habits make it susceptible for increased transformation rate. The incidence of oral carcinoma in other sites is related to the geographical variations of the studies conducted and also due to varied habit patterns such as buccal mucosa owing to studies on Kerala population with chewing habits, floor of mouth due to extensive study on sublingual keratosis, palate because of reverse smoking in Andhra Pradesh population and lip in rural areas engaged in agriculture exposed to prolonged sunlight. The authors also accept the bias subjected to biopsy referrals from tumor clinics. [3],[7],[9],[14],[15],[16],[17]

Speckled leukoplakia showed an increased risk for MT in most of the studies. [9],[15],[17],[18] The presence of carcinoma in situ/frank carcinoma in the erythematous areas suggests that the biologic behavior of the lesion to show transformation is due to its increased permeability to carcinogens through the thin epithelium as hypothesized for oral submucous fibrosis undergoing MT. [19] The present study also confirmed the potential of homogenous leukoplakias to undergo MT. [7],[9] This suggest the possible role of other risk factors such as site, genetic mutation and mechanical trauma association in the causal of transformation.

When we checked the efficacy of grading on predicting malignant potential, it was noted that there was no significant relationship between the number of mild, moderate and severe dysplasia undergoing malignant conversion.

We also observed that a significant number of hyperkeratosis without dysplasia cases underwent MT. In a study by Silverman et al. 1984 on 257 patients, of the 45 patients that underwent MT, only 8 had dysplasia; however, the author failed to subclassify the grades of dysplasia. [7] The rest 34 patients did not harbor any dysplasia. Yet, in another study by Lind 1987, of the 157 patients studied, 14 underwent a transformation. In these 14 patients, 6 patients had severe, 4 moderate, 1 mild dysplasia and 3 showed absence of dysplasia (2 gingiva, 1 mandibular sulcus). The author suggests that histopathology is mandatory, but dysplasia grading was unreliable. [9] Many other studies also have show similar lack of clarity on dysplastic grading and also report mild/non dysplastic lesions undergoing MT. [18] This suggests the mere absence of dysplasia does not exclude the possibility of MT. Similar conclusion is drawn by other authors. [3],[15] Since the invasion of tumor cells occurs from the basal layer and basal cells are prone to mutations responsible for MT, we believe that mild dysplasia involving basal third is largely underestimated and concluded as having a lower risk. In the present study, hyperkeratosis without dysplasia showed a higher rate of transformation even compared to the dysplastic group. This may be due to the lack of uniformity in grading as some clubbed mild with moderate and others moderate with severe, some clubbed all the dysplastic cases under one heading, and some have separated all the three grades resulting in a distribution of dysplastic cases reducing the sample size.

Our meta-analysis concludes that carcinogenic transformation of a preexisting lesion is multifactorial and is patient specific. Therefore, all lesions diagnosed as leukoplakia should be biopsied not with the intention to grade dysplasia but to make sure that there is no existing cancer. The protocol to delineate a high-risk lesion should include gender (as an increased tendency for female to show transformation) and site (as accentuated tendency for the lateral border of tongue, gingiva, floor of mouth and buccal mucosa to demonstrate transformation is observed). Speckled leukoplakias, nonhomogenous and homogenous in any of the above-mentioned sites should indicate a high degree of caution.

Habit association and histopathologic grade of dysplasia have the least significance as tobacco history, nonhabit, nondysplastic, mild, moderate and severe are all associated with more or less similar degree of transformation. [20],[21],[22],[23],[24]

Therefore, we demarcate:

High-risk lesions in this order:

  1. Any gender, ±TS, any site, speckled leukoplakia, ±dysplasia
  2. Any gender, ±tobacco habit, tongue/gingiva/floor of mouth/buccal mucosa, homogenous/nonhomogenous, ±dysplasia
  3. Females, nonhabit association, any clinical type, ±dysplasia
  4. Any gender, ±tobacco habit, any site, nodular/verrucous/ulcerated leukoplakia, ±dysplasia
  5. Any gender, nonhabit association, any type.
Low risk:

  1. Any gender, +tobacco habit, buccal mucosa/palate/lip/commissure, homogenous, ±dysplasia
  2. Any gender, snuff dippers, buccal mucosa/palate/lip/commissure, homogenous, ±dysplasia.
Draw backs

Lack of uniformity in reporting data among different studies resulted in the distribution of samples under different headings reducing the sample size. Some studies failed to mention the total number of cases studied under each factor such as age, sex, clinical subtypes and histologic grades. Some studies did not mention all the data pertaining to cases that underwent MT and cases that regressed [Table 7]. Therefore, precise values were difficult to obtain.

The reason behind the unanswered questions about the most often spoken topic dysplasia is lack of expression of sufficient data, non-uniformity among studies and fewer numbers of follow-up studies.
Table 7: Overall comparison between number of cases and malignant transformation


Click here to view


Future directions

  • We suggest better structured follow-up studies involving a total number of cases studied under each parameter and MT under that parameter to be mentioned. It also applies for lesions that have regressed to get a clear picture of characteristics of lesions that regressed or disappeared completely
  • Molecular studies should be the next path toward grading leukoplakia as high risk or low risk.
Acknowledgement

We acknowledge Dr. Sadhana Shenoy for intellectual support and Dr. K. P. Suresh and Ramya G Rao for helping us in statistics.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
World Health Organization. Report of a Meeting of Investigators on the Histological Definition of Precancerous Lesions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1973.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Gupta PC, Mehta FS, Daftary DK, Pindborg JJ, Bhonsle RB, Jalnawalla PN, et al. Incidence rates of oral cancer and natural history of oral precancerous lesions in a 10-year follow-up study of Indian villagers. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980;8:283-333.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Mincer HH, Coleman SA, Hopkins KP. Observations on the clinical characteristics of oral lesions showing histologic epithelial dysplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:389-99.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Bánóczy J, Csiba A. Occurrence of epithelial dysplasia in oral leukoplakia. Analysis and follow-up study of 12 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976;42:766-74.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bouquot JE, Ephros H. Erythroplakia: The dangerous red mucosa. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:59-67.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Silverman S, Bhargava K, Smith LW, Malaowalla AM. Malignant transformation and natural history of oral leukoplakia in 57,518 industrial workers of Gujarat, India. Cancer 1976;38:1790-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Silverman S Jr., Gorsky M, Lozada F. Oral leukoplakia and malignant transformation. A follow-up study of 257 patients. Cancer 1984;53:563-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Lee JJ, Hong WK, Hittelman WN, Mao L, Lotan R, Shin DM, et al. Predicting cancer development in oral leukoplakia: Ten years of translational research. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:1702-10.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Lind PO. Malignant transformation in oral leukoplakia. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:449-55.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Warnakulasuriya S, Johnson NW, van der Waal I. Nomenclature and classification of potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa. J Oral Pathol Med 2007;36:575-80.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Schepman KP, van der Meij EH, Smeele LE, van der Waal I. Malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia: A follow-up study of a hospital-based population of 166 patients with oral leukoplakia from The Netherlands. Oral Oncol 1998;34:270-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Thomson PJ. Field change and oral cancer: New evidence for widespread carcinogenesis? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:262-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Einhorn J, Wersall J. Incidence of oral carcinoma in patients with leukoplakia of the oral mucosa. Cancer 1967;20:2189-93.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Mehta FS, Pindborg JJ, Gupta PC, Daftary DK. Epidemiologic and histologic study of oral cancer and leukoplakia among 50,915 villagers in India. Cancer 1969;24:832-49.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Bánóczy J, Sugár L. Longitudinal studies in oral leukoplakias. J Oral Pathol 1972;1:265-72.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Pogrel MA. Sublingual keratosis and malignant transformation. J Oral Pathol 1979;8:176-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Roed-Peterson B. Cancer development in Oral leukoplakia: Follow up of 331 patients. J Dent Res 1971;50:711.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Cowan CG, Gregg TA, Napier SS, McKenna SM, Kee F. Potentially malignant oral lesions in Northern Ireland: A 20-year population-based perspective of malignant transformation. Oral Dis 2001;7:18-24.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.
Desai RS, Mamatha GS, Khatri MJ, Shetty SJ. Immunohistochemical expression of CD34 for characterization and quantification of mucosal vasculature and its probable role in malignant transformation of atrophic epithelium in oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Oncol 2010;46:553-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.
Waldron CA, Shafer WG. Leukoplakia revisited. A clinicopathologic study 3256 oral leukoplakias. Cancer 1975;36:1386-92.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
Hogewind WF, van der Kwast WA, van der Waal I. Oral leukoplakia, with emphasis on malignant transformation. A follow-up study of 46 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1989;17:128-33.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    
22.
Ho PS, Chen PL, Warnakulasuriya S, Shieh TY, Chen YK, Huang IY. Malignant transformation of oral potentially malignant disorders in males: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 2009;9:260.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Ho MW, Risk JM, Woolgar JA, Field EA, Field JK, Steele JC, et al. The clinical determinants of malignant transformation in oral epithelial dysplasia. Oral Oncol 2012;48:969-76.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]    
24.
Hsue SS, Wang WC, Chen CH, Lin CC, Chen YK, Lin LM. Malignant transformation in 1458 patients with potentially malignant oral mucosal disorders: A follow-up study based in a Taiwanese hospital. J Oral Pathol Med 2007;36:25-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (996 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed400    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded112    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007