Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
SHORT COMMUNICATION  
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 511-514
 

Twitter for microblogging in oral health care, research, and academics: Road map and future directions


1 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh; Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh; Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission13-Jun-2021
Date of Acceptance03-Jul-2021
Date of Web Publication11-Jan-2022

Correspondence Address:
Aman Chowdhry
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh; Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi - 110 025
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_190_21

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Current times have seen growing use of social medial tools, including microblogging sites like Twitter as an efficient method to disseminate information related to health amongst patients, students as well as health care workers. This article explores the role of this short, effective messaging platform in oral health care, teaching, research and learning. The concepts of “tweeting the meeting” and aggregation of conversations via “hashtags” is advocated for academic conferences, which will extend the conference reach to give the users better access to the instructors and enhance the related outcomes. Tweeting and retweeting the required research content may increase the academic footprint of the conducted research and researchers. In addition, it has served an immense role in the current COVID-19 pandemic by the regular circulation of information to the public and helped governments in policymaking and showcasing the areas of public concern. However, it still has a huge potential yet to be explored, with collective efforts towards strengthening the aspects of authenticity and standardization of the shared content.


Keywords: COVID-19, hashtags, microblogging, oncology, oral health, social media, Twitter


How to cite this article:
Chowdhry A, Kapoor P. Twitter for microblogging in oral health care, research, and academics: Road map and future directions. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2021;25:511-4

How to cite this URL:
Chowdhry A, Kapoor P. Twitter for microblogging in oral health care, research, and academics: Road map and future directions. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 17];25:511-4. Available from: https://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2021/25/3/511/335509





   Introduction Top


Usage of social media tools for research and academics is under-utilized.[1] However, these tools have the potential of instantaneous scientific dialogue with large population groups, which includes health care workers (HCWs), medical students and patients. Microblogging platforms such as Twitter could become a successful channel through which HCW and patients can interact, engage and transfer medical-related information.[1],[2] At present, Twitter is the most popular socializing tool used for healthcare-related communication,[3],[4] though “some argue that social media has no place in healthcare, while others claim that the open sharing of information enabled by social media would revolutionize accessibility to medicine.”[3]

The current short communication explores the role Twitter can play in sharing information in an oral health care (OHC) research and academics perspective. The suggestions generated by us are based on thorough literature search and can prove to be useful in the OHC context.


   Understanding Tweeting Top


Twitter is an online social media platform for sending short messages amongst groups of recipients by using personal computers or mobile telephones. Maximum texting of 280 words per tweet is allowed and the importance of a single tweet can be gauged by a count of “'retweets” and “likes.”[1],[5]


   Tweeting and Oral Health Care Top


Tweeting has been utilized and discussed concerning various medical sub-domains including vascular surgery,[1] oncology/cancers,[6],[7] cardiology,[8] psychiatry,[2] breast cancer prevention[9] and bowel disease.[10] Although Twitter usage in pathology context has been published,[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18] but its usage OHC context is still in infancy and needs to be documented and utilized fully. Twitter can be used in OHC and disease, especially in oral cancers context for rapid science dissemination, global engagement audience and for real-time coverage of related congresses.


   Evidence-Based Tweeting in Oral Health Care Top


Tweeting has been serving various purposes in dentistry, including analyzing the practitioner's perspective of patient expectations,[19] and for patient information and feelings (positive/negative) in orthodontics,[20] and dental pain monitoring during public health surveillance.[21] However, the disadvantages reported related to information on Twitter include lack of standardization, limited content upload without peer review, hence no validity of the information.[22] All this highlights the need of authentic evidence-supported interactions on Twitter.

Djuricich 2014 described the concept of Evidence-Based Tweeting (EBT) as “A format for providing links to evidence and referencing peer-reviewed publications through Twitter. EBT is accomplished by including Uniform Resource Locator (URL) links to PubMed articles in tweets outlining a particular topic.”[23] EBT has been discussed in various medical fields[1],[8] and should be utilized by oral HCW (OHCW).

”Twitter journal clubs” and “Twitter chats” have been suggested related to medical education.[2] These can be tweeted for OHC discussions along with web links of authentic sources to make the interactions evidence supported.


   Twitter Use in Oral Health Care Conferences Top


Many national and international conferences related to oral health (care research, academics and surgeries) remain scarcely attended by many attendees due to multiple reasons such as time constraints, visa requirements, financial liabilities and more recently COVID-19 threat. It has been tested for perceptions of students in an oral and maxillofacial radiology course conducted in the United States and reported improved accessibility of instructor, better viewing of radiographic examples and overall an enhanced experience for learning and teaching.[24]

At present Twitter is intertwined with almost all industries, with medical/dental conferences being no exception. It has been established that “Twitter participants for a conference is positively associated with Twitter activity metrics.”[25] Luc and Antonoff 2018 have discussed the utilization of Twitter for maximizing the conference participation, using the “tweeting the meeting” concept. This is done for real-time interactions related to scholarly activity in the conference, critical appraisal and broadened networking venue both synchronously and asynchronously.[26]

Organizers of OHC related conferences can utilize the Twitter platform for enhancing engagement beyond the conference walls.[27] Involving registered/unregistered participants and the general public can play a critical role to decrease the economic and oral-disease burden related to OHC diseases like oral cancers, dental caries, etc. EBT by increasing the distribution of information during the conference to the scientific community and general public.

Conference organizers should use a social media strategy and promote the use of Twitter conference hashtags before, during and after the event. Hashtags of the conference can aggregate conversations so that all stakeholders can be engaged irrespective of they may or may not be present in the conference.[27],[28]


   Using Twitter Microblogging for Oral Health Care, Research And Academics Top


Thompson et al.[29] have provided prelude for implementing Twitter for the busy HCW. [Table 1] enumerates few uses of Twitter in OHC, research and academics and what to tweet for the same. It has been pointed out that very few PubMed-listed articles are tweeted, suggesting underutilization of the Twitter platform.[30] Twitter should be used for increasing the academic footprint of own research work[31] and frequently divert online traffic towards the thrust scientific work. OHCW and students should utilize Twitter microblogging effectively for patient care, research and academics while being ethically correct and maintaining credibility.
Table 1: Usage of Twitter in oral health care, research and academics

Click here to view


Information about fudged data, erroneous methodology and scientific misconduct can disseminate fast on Twitter and can be an early warning sign for papers.[32] However, many simple queries or confusions related to publication can be managed “away from the journal” on the Twitter platform.


   Twitter in COVID-19 and Oral Health Context Top


Plenty of literature has been published related to COVID-19 and Twitter.[33],[34],[35],[36],[37] Important information related to OHC, national/international guidelines for OHCW, COVID-19 vaccination, COVID-19 diagnostics, etc., needs to be tweeted and retweeted for benefit of OHCW and patients. A recent study analyzed tweets for circulation of oral health information related to COVID-19 on Chinese Social Media, and found that it is useful in providing better facilitation of oral health-related communication and thus aid policy decision and showcase public concern.[38]


   Conclusion Top


The current article is a novel insight into the plausibility of social media Twitter handles in the distribution of health-related information, in multiple disciplines of medicine and dentistry. In addition, it creates evidence to support the use of these microblogging sites for studying patients and practitioner's perceptions for varied treatments indicated by their positive or negative responses. The conduction of conferences or courses for teaching and learning has been revolutionized by instant dissemination of content and real-time interaction with the course faculty or by image sharing. It has served in the facilitation of news, data, or report sharing related to COVID-19, in terms of vaccinations, oral health-related information, or diagnostics, which has thus benefitted the governments in formulating policies or guidelines. However, the aspects of research and academics are still neglected in Twitter domains and may be explored further to promote ethical redistribution of scientific content.

Through this short communication, we make a humble submission to authorities of both Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists and its official publication Journal of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Pathology to utilize Twitter platform to explore tweeting potential in acquiring or notification of evidence-based information and utilizing live tweeting in its organized events.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Argyriou C, Lazarides MK, Georgiadis GS. “Evidence-based tweeting” in vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 2020;68:542-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Peters ME, Uible E, Chisolm MS. A Twitter Education: Why Psychiatrists Should Tweet. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2015;17:94.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Pershad Y, Hangge PT, Albadawi H, Oklu R. Social Medicine: Twitter in Healthcare. J Clin Med 2018;7:121.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V. Big data analytics in healthcare: Promise and potential. Health Inf Sci Syst 2014;2:3.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Twitter | History, Description, & Uses | Britannica. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Twitter. [Last accessed on 2021 May 14].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Milley KM, Chima SA, Cummings KL, Emery JD. Look who's talking now: Cancer in primary care on Twitter. An observational study. BJGP Open 2021;5:bjgpopen20X101134.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
De Fiore L, Ascierto P. Using Twitter in oncology. Research, continuing education, and advocacy. Recenti Prog Med 2015;106:40-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Gouda P. Evidence-based tweeting in cardiology: Unanswered questions and future directions. JACC Heart Fail 2018;6:439-40.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Thackeray R, Burton SH, Giraud-Carrier C, Rollins S, Draper CR. Using Twitter for breast cancer prevention: An analysis of breast cancer awareness month. BMC Cancer 2013;13:508.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Pérez-Pérez M, Pérez-Rodríguez G, Fdez-Riverola F, Lourenço A. Using twitter to understand the human bowel disease community: Exploratory analysis of key topics. Med Internet Res 2019;21:e12610.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Allen TC. Social media: Pathologists' force multiplier. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014;138:1000-1.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Fuller MY, Allen TC. Let's Have a Tweetup: The Case for Using Twitter Professionally. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;140:956-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Lepe M, Oltulu P, Canepa M, Wu RI, Deeken A, Alex D, et al. #EBUSTwitter: Novel Use of Social Media for Conception, Coordination, and Completion of an International, Multicenter Pathology Study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2019;144:878-82.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Carlquist E, Lee NE, Shalin SC, Goodman M, Gardner JM. Dermatopathology and social media: A survey of 131 medical professionals from 29 countries. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142:184-90.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Freitag CE, Arnold MA, Gardner JM, Arnold CA. If You Are not on Social Media, Here's What You're Missing! #DoTheThing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017;141:1567-76.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mazer BL, Fuller MY, Lepe M, Reyes-Múgica M, Crane GM, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Social media in pathology: Continuing a tradition of dialogue and education. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142:889-90.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Gonzalez RS, Amer SM, Yahia NB, Costa FD, Noatay M, Qiao JH, et al. Facebook discussion groups provide a robust worldwide platform for free pathology education. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;141:690-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Gardner JM, Allen TC. Keep calm and tweet on: Legal and ethical considerations for pathologists using social media. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2019;143:75-80.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Utilization of Social Media in Orthodontic Practice: Practitioner's Perspective. BBRC; 2020. Available from: http://bbrc.in/bbrc/utilization-of-social-media- in-orthodontic- practice-practitioners-perspective/. [Last accessed on 2021 May 19].  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Noll D, Mahon B, Shroff B, Carrico C, Lindauer SJ. Twitter analysis of the orthodontic patient experience with braces vs Invisalign. Angle Orthod 2017;87:377-83.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Heaivilin N, Gerbert B, Page JE, Gibbs JL. Public health surveillance of dental pain via Twitter. J Dent Res 2011;90:1047-51.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Kapoor P, Aziz SB. Recent advances in orthodontics. In: Dentistry: Advances in Research and Future Directions. 1st ed. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2021. p. 99-132.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Djuricich AM. Social media, evidence-based tweeting, and JCEHP. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2014;34:202-4.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Gonzalez SM, Gadbury-Amyot CC. Using twitter for teaching and learning in an oral and maxillofacial radiology course. J Dent Educ 2016;80:149-55.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Schwenk ES, Jaremko KM, Park BH, Stiegler MA, Gamble JG, Chu LF, et al. I tweet, therefore I learn: An analysis of twitter use across anesthesiology conferences. Anesth Analg 2020;130:333-40.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Luc JG, Antonoff MB. Live tweet the society of thoracic surgeons annual meeting: How to leverage twitter to maximize your conference experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;106:1597-601.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Martischang R, Tartari E, Kilpatrick C, Mackenzie G, Carter V, Castro-Sánchez E, et al. Enhancing engagement beyond the conference walls: Analysis of Twitter use at #ICPIC2019 infection prevention and control conference. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2021;10:20.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Santarone K, Boneva D, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. Hashtags in healthcare: Understanding Twitter hashtags and online engagement at the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma 2016–2019 meetings. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2020;5:e000496.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Thompson MA, Majhail NS, Wood WA, Perales MA, Chaboissier M. Social media and the practicing hematologist: Twitter 101 for the busy healthcare provider. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2015;10:405-12.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Betz K, Knuf F, Duncker D, Giordano M, Dobrev D, Linz D. The impact of Twitter promotion on future citation rates: The #TweetTheJournal study. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2021;33:100776.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Chowdhry A, Kapoor P, Popli DB. Strengthening health care research and academics during and after COVID19 pandemic – An Indian perspective. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2020;10:343-6.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Haunschild R, Bornmann L. Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers. Scientometrics 2021;126:5181-99.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Liu S, Liu J. Understanding behavioral intentions toward COVID-19 vaccines: Theory-based content analysis of tweets. J Med Internet Res 2021;23:e28118.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
He L, He C, Reynolds TL, Bai Q, Huang Y, Li C, et al. Why do people oppose mask wearing? A comprehensive analysis of U.S. tweets during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28:1564-73.   Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Dyer J, Kolic B. Public risk perception and emotion on Twitter during the Covid-19 pandemic. Appl Netw Sci 2020;5:99.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Tao C, Diaz D, Xie Z, Chen L, Li D, O' Connor R. Potential impact of a COVID-19 and smoking paper on Twitter users' attitudes toward smoking: Observational study. JMIR Form Res 2021;5:e25010.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Nikolovska M, Johnson SD, Ekblom P. “Show this thread”: Policing, disruption and mobilisation through Twitter. An analysis of UK law enforcement tweeting practices during the Covid-19 pandemic. Crime Sci 2020;9:20.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Tao ZY, Chu G, McGrath C, Hua F, Leung YY, Yang WF, et al. Nature and diffusion of COVID-19-related oral health information on Chinese social media: Analysis of tweets on weibo. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e19981.  Back to cited text no. 38
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (466 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Understanding Tw...
    Tweeting and Ora...
    Evidence-Based T...
    Twitter Use in O...
    Using Twitter Mi...
    Twitter in COVID...
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed30    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded10    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007