Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
ONLINE ONLY ARTICLES - REVIEW ARTICLE  
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 128-129
 

Risk of liver disease in areca nut habitual: A systematic review


1 Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Sawangi (M), Maharashtra, India
2 Human Physiology, JNMC, Wardha, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission21-Sep-2021
Date of Decision31-Dec-2021
Date of Acceptance24-Jan-2022
Date of Web Publication31-Mar-2022

Correspondence Address:
Suwarna B Dangore Khasbage
Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_345_21

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Background: Areca nut (AN) is one of the addictive substances known to cause deleterious effects on oral cavity as well as on various body organs including liver. But, scanty information is available reporting the adverse effects of AN chewing on the liver.
Aim: To study the risk of liver disease in AN habitual based on the relevant published data.
Methods: The literature search was performed by an electronic search of the PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar databases using proper MESH headings and retrieved the articles published from 1998 to 2021. The eligibility criteria included: Human studies, AN habitual as study participants, use of controls and articles published in English. Data were extracted regarding characteristics of studies, characteristics of AN exposure, effect estimate and outcome of the studies.
Results: Total 253 articles were identified from various databases and 15 studies were selected that met the inclusion criteria. Among these, thirteen studies showed an association between AN habit and attenuation of risk of liver disease as determined by relative risk/odds ratio/hazard ratio. Eleven studies described additive effect of AN and HBsAg and/or Anti hepatitis C virus status on development of liver disease. However, two of the studies showed opposite results. The heterogeneity in the study designs, exposure characteristics, outcomes and confounders precluded further meta-analysis.
Conclusion: The association between AN chewing and an increased risk of developing liver disease is noted which necessitates the need for AN cessation campaign.


Keywords: Areca nut, areca nut habitual, betel quid, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cirrhosis, liver fibrosis


How to cite this article:
Dangore Khasbage SB, Bhowate RR, Khatib N. Risk of liver disease in areca nut habitual: A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2022;26:128-9

How to cite this URL:
Dangore Khasbage SB, Bhowate RR, Khatib N. Risk of liver disease in areca nut habitual: A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 May 25];26:128-9. Available from: https://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2022/26/1/128/341402





   Introduction Top


Liver disease includes many diverse conditions that affect the morphology as well as function of the liver and accounts for approximately two million deaths/year worldwide; one million due to complications of liver cirrhosis (LC) and one million due to viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).[1],[2] The etiology of liver disease is multi-factorial. However, the growing epidemiological evidence indicates that a number of risk factors like excessive alcohol drinking, hepatitis B and C infection, obesity, family history etc., modulate the risk of developing chronic liver diseases.[3] Among these, areca nut (AN) consumption is also one of the risk factors. Evolutions of these risk factors provide insight into understanding of future burden of liver disease.

AN is a fruit of areca catechu palm tree, which is native of South Asia and Pacific Islands. It is chewed regularly by at least 10% of the world population of all the groups and is the fourth most widely used addictive substance.[4],[5] Its consumption causes many harmful effects on the human body due to the presence of alkaloids in it.[6] These effects of the alkaloids of AN are not only limited to the oral cavity where it comes into direct contact but may also affect various organs in response to its break down and excretion products.[5] Liver is the one among them susceptible to AN induced damage.

Though a number of studies are there showing association of AN in causation of oral diseases like oral submucous fibrosis and oral squamous cell carcinoma[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10] little evidence is available which explained the systemic adverse effects of AN. Considering this research gap in the literature, the present review was carried out to address a question “Are AN habitual at increased risk of developing liver disease” The Hypothesis would be, the AN habitual may be at increased risk of developing liver disease. To our knowledge scanty literature is available reporting the detrimental effects of AN chewing on liver.


   Methods Top


Search protocol (data source and search strategy)

The first step of search strategy comprised a search of Medline, PubMed databases of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland for appropriate articles addressing the focused question. Databases were searched from 1998 up to and including 2021 using various combinations of the following keywords: “AN,” “betel nut,” “areca catechu,” “AN habitual,” “betel nut habitual,” “betel nut chewing,” “liver fibrosis,” “fibrosis of liver,” “LC,” “cirrhosis of liver,” “liver disease,” “hepatic disease” “HCC,” “liver cancer,” “hepatoma” etc., and the second step was to hand-search the reference lists of original and review articles that were found to be relevant in the first step.

Titles and abstracts of articles obtained using the above-described search protocol were screened by each author. Only full text articles were selected after assessing its eligibility and checked for agreement. Any disagreements between the authors were resolved via discussion. All the well-designed original studies published in English that covered the effect of AN consumption on liver were selected. Search strategy used in PubMed was as under.

([[[[areca* [Title/Abstract]] odds ratio [OR] catechu* [Title/Abstract])] OR “betel nut*” [Title/Abstract]] OR “Areca” [Mesh]) AND ([[[[[[[[[[[[[“LC”[Title/Abstract]] OR “LC”[Title/Abstract]] OR “cirrhosis of liver” [Title/Abstract]] OR ''hepatic disease” [Title/Abstract]] OR “fibrosis of liver” [Title/Abstract]] OR “hepatic disease*” [Title/Abstract]] OR “HCC *” [Title/Abstract]] OR “liver cancer” [Title/Abstract]] OR “HCC *” [Title/Abstract]] OR HCC [Title/Abstract]] OR “hepatoma*” [Title/Abstract]] OR “Carcinoma, Hepatocellular” [Mesh]) OR “liver carcinoma” [Title/Abstract]) OR “Liver Diseases” [Mesh]).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

With the consensus of all the authors the following eligibility criteria were decided for the selection of articles. (1) human studies; (2) test group: Individuals consuming AN, (3) control group: individuals not using AN in any form, (4) individuals suffering from liver disease and (5) articles published in English. All prospective, retrospective, case–control, community-based, hospital-based studies were included in which association between AN consumption and liver disease is assessed. Studies on animal models, unpublished articles, letters to the editor, review articles, books were excluded. Habitual having a habit of chewing AN with or without tobacco associated with alcohol consumption were excluded.

From the enrolled studies, data was extracted regarding characteristics of studies, study population, characteristics of exposure, assessment tools used to evaluate AN habit and liver disease as well as effect estimate and outcome of the studies. We had planned to undertake meta-analysis but due to heterogeneity in studies with reference to type of population, type of exposure, type of assessment methods used, we did not undertake meta-analysis that would have provided a summary estimation of different results.


   Results Top


In total, 253 articles were retrieved from electronic-database (PubMed/Medline: 51, SCOPUS: 42, Google Scholar: 125 and EMBASE: 19 and manual searching: 16). Out of these, 207 titles remained for screening after the removal of duplicates. On review of the titles and abstracts of all these articles, 179 publications were excluded because these did not report association of AN in development of liver disease. Consequently, 28 full-text articles were then reviewed to assess their eligibility, out of which, 13 were excluded because these were review articles, case reports or articles with animal studies. Ultimately, 15 articles that met the eligibility criteria were included and processed for data extraction to include in this systematic literature review. [Figure 1] depicts 'Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses' flow-chart showing flow of information.
Figure 1: “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses” flow-chart showing flow of information

Click here to view


Characteristics of the studies and study subjects

All the studies included in the present review were human studies conducted either at hospital or in community [Table 1].[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25] Out of these, eight were case–control studies,[11],[12],[13],[14],[16],[17],[18],[21] four were community-based studies,[15],[19],[20],[25] one study each was prospective, retrospective and population-based cohort study.[22],[23],[24] About geographical location of the studies, twelve studies were conducted in Taiwan, two in India and one in Pakistan. These three countries are located in Asia, but Taiwan in East Asia while India and Pakistan in South Asia. The sample size ranged from 26 to 60,326 participants. All the enrolled studies included control or comparison group except a study by Wang LY et al. 2003.[19] as shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Characteristics of all included studies including type of liver disease

Click here to view


Characteristics of study subjects revealed that the age of the participants ranged from 14 years and above. In a study by Tsai JF et al.,[13] the participants were in wider age range, which was from 23 to 83 years. In terms of gender of study population, eligible subjects consisted of male and female, except for two studies that recruited either male or female.[19],[24] With reference to type of liver disease, in four studies, HCC;[13],[17],[19],[25] in five studies, LC;[12],[16],[20],[22],[23] in one study each, liver fibrosis and chronic liver disease were the AN associated disorder.[11],[18] In a study by Tsai JF et al.,[14] all HCC patients with habitual betel quid chewing also had LC while Wu GHM et al.[15] assessed association of betel quid chewing with LC as well as HCC. In two studies, researchers did not mention about the type of liver disease [Table 1].[21],[24]

Assessment tools used to evaluate AN habit and liver disease

To get detail information relevant to AN habit from participants, “standardize personal interview using a structured questionnaire,” was the assessment tool used in most of the studies.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[23] In a study by Chu YH et al.[22] retrospectively analyzed data was retrieved from Adult Preventive Medical Services and the National Health Insurance Research Datasets and habit information was gathered from the questionnaire. In three studies, information about exposure to AN was obtained through history[11],[21],[24] and personally interviewing the participants.[25] Lin CF et al. invited the participants to participate in physical examination and detailed questionnaire about health history to collect the information relevant to AN habit.[20] To evaluate the type of liver disease, cytology and biopsy of liver,[13],[14],[16],[17],[18] ultrasonography abdomen[11],[12],[13],[20],[25] and biochemical markers for liver diseases like aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) etc.[12],[15],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[24],[25] were the assessment tools used in the enrolled studies.

Characteristics of exposure

The daily consumption of AN ranged from one quid a day to 28 times daily and duration of AN consumption ranged from 6 months to >30 years in the included studies. Three studies didn't state about the frequency[11],[23],[25] while six studies didn't mention the duration of AN consumption [Table 1].[11],[19],[20],[22],[24],[25] Nonetheless the terms, “Never,” “Occasional” and “Frequent” are used to describe the frequency of AN consumption in two studies.[22],[24] Similarly, to describe the duration of habit, “Never chewer,” “Current chewer” and “Ex chewer” are the words used.[15],[18] With reference to duration, Lan TY et al. categorized the participants as never chewer and ever chewer [Table 2].[23]
Table 2: The characteristics of areca nut exposure in all included studies

Click here to view


As shown in [Table 2], in regards to the form of AN consumed, seven studies mentioned consumption of AN in the form of BQ[12],[17],[18],[19],[20],[23],[25] while in three studies it was consumed either as AN with betel leaf or AN with betel fruit or mixed form.[13],[14],[16] In a study by Singroha K et al. the consumption was in the form of AN with tobacco called as “AN quid.”[21] However, in three studies, participants consumed AN or BN only.[11],[22],[24] In one of the studies by Wu GH et al. the type of betel-chew used was “Lao-Hwa.”[15] “Lao-Hwa” is used in Keelung city and is prepared by combining pieces of unripe A. catechu palm nuts with a piece of the inflorescence (flower head) of the Piper betel vine and red lime paste, that is swallowed after chewing.[26] However, in another study, form of AN was not mentioned [Table 2].[25]

Effect estimates or outcome-AN as an independent risk factor for liver disease

Among all the included studies, twelve studies observed AN as an independent risk factor for various liver diseases like LC,[12],[15],[16],[20],[22],[23] HCC,[13],[15],[17],[19] HCC complicating cirrhosis,[14] liver fibrosis,[11] chronic liver disease [Table 3].[18] The population-attributable risk for BQ chewing was 20.19% in HCC,[13] 11.60% in LC[16] and 20.10% in HCC complicating LC.[14] Wang LY et al. studied the risk of HCC in three habits of substance use (smoking, alcohol drinking) including BQ habit and observed (relative risk [RR] = 1.59 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–2.85) in BQ chewers among these three habits of substance use.[19] On estimation of serum biomarkers to assess the independent role of AN habit in causation of liver disease, six studies showed positive association.[12],[14],[18],[19],[20],[22] But, one of the studies showed opposite results as serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase level was significantly high in nonbetel nut chewers groups (24.7 ± 6.40) as compared to chewers group (17.5 ± 5.72).[24] In another study, authors concluded that long-term chewing of AN is not hepatotoxic because though there was statistically significant difference between betel nut chewers (mean = 33.80) and nonchewers (mean = 24.20), the levels of AST as well as ALP were within normal range [Table 3].[21]
Table 3: Effect estimate of areca nut chewing with reference to the type, duration and amount of areca nut chewed

Click here to view


Regarding duration of consumption of AN, three studies reported increased risk of liver disease with odds ratio [OR] = 15.06 (95% CI, 4.36–39.09) for HCC,[13] OR = 9.04 (95% CI, 1.13–67.21) for LC[16] and OR = 18.89 (95% CI, 2.58–92.44) for HCC complicating LC,[14] if the duration of consumption is >30 years. Likewise, risk of liver disease was reported to be more in current chewer (OR = 3.9, 95% CI, 1.6–10.1 and hazard ratio [HR] = 3.87, 95% CI, 2.62–5.73), ever chewer HR = 1.62 (95% CI, 0.79–3.31) and frequent chewer OR = 3.06 (95% C. I: 1.69–5.57) as compared to ex-chewer, never chewer and occasional chewer, respectively.[15],[18],[22],[23] One of studies by Wu GH et al. showed controversial results relevant to duration of habit, as the risk of liver disease being maximum on consumption of AN for 10–19 years (HR = 5.69, 95% CI, 3.21–10.08) as compared to duration >20 years (HR = 1.98, 95% CI, 1.18–3.32) [Table 3].[15]

Similarly, concerning the association of risk of liver disease with amount of AN consumed, five studies showed increased risk of HCC and LC with increase in amount of BQ consumed [Table 3].[12],[13],[15],[16],[19] However, one study mentioned contradictory results, as HCC complicating cirrhosis risk was maximum on consumption of 100–200 quids ×1000 (OR = 12.59, 95% CI, 2.78–49.11) while the same study showed reduced risk of liver disease on consumption of >200 quids ×1000 (OR = 7.13, 95% CI, 1.92–22.73).[14] In a study by Hsiao TJ et al. more risk of LC is reported on consumption of BQ >55 quid/year.[12]

As regards to the form of AN consumed, two studies showed maximum risk of liver disease on consumption of AN with Betel leaf (OR = 5.93, 95% CI, 1.87–16.65 and OR = 7.55, 95% CI, 2.42–20.18).[14],[16] One of the studies showed maximum risk of HCC on consumption of AN with betel fruit (OR = 5.02, 95% CI, 2.25–11.50).[13] Nevertheless the minimum risk of LC, HCC and HCC complicating LC was noted on consumption of mixed form of AN in these studies [Table 3].[13],[14],[16]

Additive or combined effect between AN and HBsAg and/or Anti hepatitis C virus status [Table 3]

Though AN is observed to be an independent risk factor for development of liver diseases, eleven enrolled studies described combined or additive effect between AN and HBsAg and/or Anti hepatitis C virus status.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[22],[25] The estimated risk for HCC, LC and HCC complicating LC were found to be higher in betel quid chewers infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus infection in these studies [Table 1]. However, the highest risk is noted for HCC by additive interaction between HBV infection and BQ chewing with OR = 81.00 (95% CI, 18.02–204.13).[14] Similar increased risk is observed for combined effect of HBsAg positivity with BQ chewing in ever chewers and current or ex chewers.[15],[18],[19],[25] The combined effect of anti-hepatitis C virus positivity with BQ chewing also depicted more risk in ever chewers[18],[19] and current or ex chewers.[15],[25] In a study by Sun CA et al., on evaluation of joint effect of hepatitis C virus infection and lifestyle habits (anti-hepatitis C virus positive + habit) on the risk of HCC, RR was found to be maximum for BQ (RR = 6.8, 95% CI: 1.7, 28.2) as compared to smokers (RR = 3.9, 95% CI: 2.0, 7.7) and drinkers (RR = 4.1, 95% CI: 1.3, 13.0).[25] Likewise, the risk for LC in HBsAg positive status with BQ chewing, cigarette smoking >5 pack-years with BQ chewing and alcohol drinking with BQ chewing more than 55quids/year was OR = 4.8 (95% CI, 1.2–19.3), OR = 5.2 (95% CI, 1.8–14.8) and OR = 7.7 (95% CI, 2.3–25.8), respectively, which was found to be greater than the individuals consuming the amount <55 quids/year. In addition to these, four studies reported, alcohol drinking, cigarette smoking, betel quid chewing, were also associated with a significantly elevated risk of chronic liver disease [Table 3].[12],[18],[19],[25]


   Discussion Top


The present review addresses the effect of AN consumption on risk of liver disease. On the basis of the literature reviewed, authors found it difficult to document the individualistic effect of AN on liver as AN is often consumed in combination with other components. Nevertheless, whatever may be the form, AN is the main ingredient by weight in all types of AN preparations and thus, authors took this opportunity to include the studies describing population data for consuming all the forms of AN as a valid reference value.[27],[28]

In this review, 15 articles met the eligibility criteria out of 253 retrieved articles. Among all these enrolled fifteen studies, the outcome of thirteen studies revealed association of AN in development of liver disease. Among these, twelve were from Taiwan suggesting more prevalence of the adverse effects of AN on liver in Taiwan, for which reasons might be; (i) the form of AN consumed, (ii) larger amount and longer duration of AN consumption, (iii) combined effect of AN and viral infection, as hepatitis A and/or B infection is quite common in Taiwan.[13],[14],[16] However, two studies, one from India and other from Pakistan showed no association between AN habit and liver disease.[21],[24]

It is a well-established fact that the form or method of AN consumption vary from country to country. In Taiwan, the betel quid generally contains AN, lime, a piece of P. betel inflorescence containing safrole, with or without P. betel leaf. AN is often used in the unripe stage when it is green, like a small olive and without tobacco in Taiwan whilst in India, AN is usually consumed along with tobacco.[28],[29] In Eastern India and southern Sri Lanka, fermented AN is popular. It is stated that powdered AN if placed in the oral cavity results in rapid appearance of arecoline in blood plasma, indicating speedy systemic absorption.[30] No matter what is the form, AN consumption is unsafe for oral and general health. The commercially manufactured stored forms of AN like “Ghutka,” “Pan masala” are more harmful.[28],[31]

Eight studies reported increased risk of liver disease with increase in duration and/or amount of consumption of AN.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[19],[22],[23] A maximum risk is reported on consumption for more than 30 years in a study by Tsai JF et al.(OR = 18.89, 95% CI, 2.58–92.44.[14] With reference to the amount of AN consumption, maximum risk for liver disease (HCC) was reported on consumption of >299 quid ×1000 (OD = 0.78, 95% CI, 1.87–34.01).[1] Likewise, the studies reported increased risk of liver disease in current chewers and ever chewers as compared to ex-chewers and never chewer, respectively.[15],[18],[23]

Wang LY et al. noticed significant dose–response relationship between the risk of HCC and the number of habits of substance use.[19] Risk increases with the increase in number of habits as reported in two studies which may be due to combined effect of different substances.[18],[19] Wu GHM et al. confirmed independent dose– response relationships of betel chewing with increased risk for either LC or HCC.[15] With reference to age they reported that the betel-related risk of LC is larger in under-50s, while the risk of betel-related primary HCC is larger in over-50s.[15]

Similarly, Sawaan et al. mentioned that the prolonged AN chewing can cause fibrotic changes in liver even before the appearance of oral abnormalities like submucous fibrosis, as they found fibrotic changes in 12.5% of the AN chewer and 23% of oral submucous fibrosis patients.[11] Also, they stated that the severity of fibrotic changes in liver was proportional to the severity of oral submucous fibrosis.[11] However, in contrast to this, Singroha K. et al. concluded that even long term AN consumption may not be hepatotoxic in isolation, rather acts as an associative agent in the presence of a preexisting condition such as hepatitis.[21] Still, it is curious and crucial to understand why long term AN chewing is linked with liver disease. Though there are multiple mechanisms documented in the literature, main culprit is the alkaloids present in AN (four main alkaloids namely arecoline, arecaidine, guvacoline and guvacine).

Based on available literature, various reasons explaining the role of AN in causation of liver disease are as under.[11],[12],[13],[14],[16]

  1. An exposure of fibroblasts to the extracts of betel has been suggested to trigger collagen synthesis and stabilize collagen fibrils. 2. A significant amount of reactive oxygen species production is induced by AN extract. 3. Evidence of oxidative reactions is associated with fibrogenesis occurring in the liver, 4. Fibrotic liver injury results in activation of the hepatic stellate cell which undergoes a phenotypic change to a proliferative myofibroblast-like cell that synthesizes excess interstitial collagens and other matrix components.


In addition to this, copper content in AN stimulates lysyl oxidase enzyme which enhances cross-linkage of collagen and elastin fibers that causes fibrosis of submucosal tissues[32] Also AN increase the risk of toxic hepatitis by modulating the function of hepatic detoxification system.[33],[34] One of the ingredients of Taiwanese betel quid preparation, safrole may be responsible for hepatocarcinogenesis as safrole-DNA adducts were found in HCC tissue from a heavy betel quid chewer.[35],[36] Bleibel W and Saleem suggested nonalcoholic steatohepatitis as the underlying cause of liver disease in betel chewers.[37]

One of the reasons for liver damage in AN habitual is ingestion of Aflatoxin B1 infected AN, as Aflatoxin B1 is a known hepatotoxin.[38],[39] Yan Liu and Felicia Wu reported that aflatoxin may play a causative role in 4.6%–28.2% of all global HCC cases.[40] Aflatoxin exposure in food is a significant risk factor for HCC.[41] However, Aflatoxin has a synergistic effect with hepatitis B and C virus in causing liver cancer.[42],[43] Ten included studies reported that the combined effect of AN and viral hepatitis on liver is more severe than AN alone. Related to this, two ways causal relationships can be thought off. (i) AN consumption reported to immunologically suppress body defense and increase the risk of toxic hepatitis, which might be related to other reactive oxygen adducts formed as a result of habitual betel chewing. On the contradictory, chronic hepatitis B and C virus infection compromises the immunity, makes an individual more susceptible to action of AN.

Before concluding, authors consider to describe few limitations of the present systematic review as (i) the low number of studies retrieved, the use of a language filter (which restricted our search to English language articles only), (ii) maximum studies from same geographical location (12 out of 15 studies from Taiwan), the results might not be well applicable to other populations. However, authors wish to undertake meta-analysis by including a greater number of studies, by including the studies from different locations where the AN habit is rampant. Likewise, similar studies should be carried out at other places or countries including India, as India is the second largest producer of AN producing 330,000 million tons of AN per year as well as viral hepatitis is a cause for major health care burden in Indian population.[28],[44],[45]

Last but not the least, Increased attention on the development of AN cessation programs is long overdue. A recent Indian study by Singh PK et al.[46] stated that unlike tobacco, no global policy exists for the regulation and control of AN consumption and its cessation. There is should a policy intervention to prevent both new generations from taking up AN consumption habit and helping current users to give up the habit. In addition, research is needed to examine the intention to quit among AN users, separately for all three categories–those who consume AN with tobacco, without tobacco and those who consume in both the forms – to develop an appropriate quit.[46],[47] With reference to the similar issue, Paulino YC, et al.[48] (2020) offers a notable innovations, “Betel Nut Intervention Trial” which is a randomized controlled cessation trial designed to test the efficacy of an intensive AN/BQ cessation program.


   Conclusion Top


It is apparent from this systematic review that most of the studies provide evidence supporting the increased risk of liver disease in AN habitual though the studies with controversial results also exist. As the prevalence of consumption of AN is increasing day by day, the population should be made aware about the health issues related to it, as the health of consumers is at stake.

Acknowledgment

We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to the Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (M), Wardha, for providing the help in conducting the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol 2019;70:151-71.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Byass P. The global burden of liver disease: A challenge for methods and for public health. BMC Med 2014;12:159.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Fung P, Pyrsopoulos N. Emerging concepts in alcoholic hepatitis. World J Hepatol 2017;9:567-85.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Boucher BJ, Mannan N. Metabolic effects of the consumption of Areca catechu. Addict Biol 2002;7:103-10.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Garg A, Chaturvedi P, Gupta PC. A review of the systemic adverse effects of areca nut or betel nut. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2014;35:3-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
6.
Prabhu RV, Prabhu V, Chatra L, Shenai P, Suvarna N, Dandekeri S. Areca nut and its role in oral submucous fibrosis. J Clin Exp Dent 2014;6:e569-75.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Shah G, Chaturvedi P, Vaishampayan S. Arecanut as an emerging etiology of oral cancers in India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2012;33:71-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
8.
Hande AH, Chaudhary MS, Gawande MN, Gadbail AR, Zade PR, Bajaj S, et al. Oral submucous fibrosis: An enigmatic morpho-insight. J Cancer Res Ther 2019;15:463-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kadashetti V, Shivakumar KM, Chaudhary M, Patil S, Gawande M, Hande A. Influence of risk factors on patients suffering from potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer: A case-control study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2017;21:455-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
10.
Shirzaiy M, Neshat F. Effect of areca nut on oral health: A review. J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci 2020;5:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Saawarn N, Chand PH, Gharote H, Nair P, Naik S, Srivasatava H, et al. Liver fibrosis in OSMF patients and areca nut chewers: An ultrasonographic study. Int J Adv Res 2016;4:280-3.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hsiao TJ, Liao HW, Hsieh PS, Wong RH. Risk of betel quid chewing on the development of liver cirrhosis: A community-based case-control study. Ann Epidemiol 2007;17:479-85.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Tsai JF, Chuang LY, Jeng JE, Ho MS, Hsieh MY, Lin ZY, et al. Betel quid chewing as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: A case-control study. Br J Cancer 2001;84:709-13.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Tsai JF, Jeng JE, Chuang LY, Ho MS, Ko YC, Lin ZY, et al. Habitual betel quid chewing and risk for hepatocellular carcinoma complicating cirrhosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2004;83:176-87.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Wu GH, Boucher BJ, Chiu YH, Liao CS, Chen TH. Impact of chewing betel-nut (Areca catechu) on liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: A population-based study from an area with a high prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections. Public Health Nutr 2009;12:129-35.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tsai JF, Jeng JE, Chuang LY, Ho MS, Ko YC, Lin ZY, et al. Habitual betel quid chewing as a risk factor for cirrhosis: A case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2003;82:365-72.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Jeng JE, Tsai MF, Tsai HR, Chuang LY, Lin ZY, Hsieh MY, et al. Impact of chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C on adverse hepatic fibrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma related to betel quid chewing. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:637-42.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Lin HH, Wang LY, Shaw CK, Cheng ML, Chung WK, Chiang HJ, et al. Combined effects of chronic hepatitis virus infections and substance-use habits on chronic liver diseases in Taiwanese aborigines. J Formos Med Assoc 2002;101:826-34.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Wang LY, You SL, Lu SN, Ho HC, Wu MH, Sun CA, et al. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and habits of alcohol drinking, betel quid chewing and cigarette smoking: A cohort of 2416 HBsAg-seropositive and 9421 HBsAg-seronegative male residents in Taiwan. Cancer Causes Control 2003;14:241-50.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lin CF, Shiau TJ, Ko YC, Chen PH, Wang JD. Prevalence and determinants of biochemical dysfunction of the liver in Atayal aboriginal community of Taiwan: Is betel nut chewing a risk factor? BMC Gastroenterol 2008;8:13.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Singroha K, Kamath VV. Liver function tests as a measure of hepatotoxicity in AN chewer. J Dent Res Rev 2016;3:60-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
  [Full text]  
22.
Chu YH, Wang L, Ko PC, Lan SJ, Liaw YP. The risk of cirrhosis in non-alcohol drinkers is greater in female than male betel nut chewers. Oncotarget 2018;9:8731-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Lan TY, Chang WC, Tsai YJ, Chuang YL, Lin HS, Tai TY. Areca nut chewing and mortality in an elderly cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:677-83.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Fatima T, Sultana V. Comparative study on betel nut chewers and non-chewers in Karachi females. Int J Sci Eng Res 2016;7:989-92.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Sun CA, Wu DM, Lin CC, Lu SN, You SL, Wang LY, et al. Incidence and cofactors of hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective study of 12,008 men in Taiwan. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:674-82.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Betel-quid and areca-nut chewing and some areca-nut derived nitrosamines. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 2004;85:1-334.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Dave BJ, Trivedi AH, Adhvaryu SG. In vitro genotoxic effects of areca nut extract and arecoline. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1992;118:283-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Gupta PC, Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of areca nut usage. Addict Biol 2002;7:77-83.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Warnakulasuriya S, Trivedy C, Peters TJ. Areca nut use: An independent risk factor for oral cancer. BMJ 2002;324:799-800.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Chang EE, Miao ZF, Lee WJ, Chao HR, Li LA, Wang YF, et al. Arecoline inhibits the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced cytochrome P450 1A1 activation in human hepatoma cells. J Hazard Mater 2007;146:356-61.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Gupta PC, Ray CS. Epidemiology of areca nut usage. Ann Acad Med Singap 2004;33:31S-6S.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Trivedy C, Baldwin D, Warnakulasuriya S, Johnson N, Peters T. Copper content in Areca catechu (betel nut) products and oral submucous fibrosis. Lancet 1997;349:1447.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Sarma AB, Chakrabarti J, Chakrabarti A, Banerjee TS, Roy D, Mukherjee D, et al. Evaluation of pan masala for toxic effects on liver and other organs. Food Chem Toxicol 1992;30:161-3.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Singh A, Rao AR. Evaluation of the modifying influence of arecanut on the garlic-modulated hepatic detoxication system enzymes, sulfhydryl content, and lipid peroxidation in mice. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 1995;15:127-34.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Liu CJ, Chen CL, Chang KW, Chu CH, Liu TY. Safrole in betel quid may be a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: Case report. CMAJ 2000;162:359-60.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Chung YT, Chen CL, Wu CC, Chan SA, Chi CW, Liu TY. Safrole-DNA adduct in hepatocellular carcinoma associated with betel quid chewing. Toxicol Lett 2008;183:21-7.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Bleibel W, Saleem S. Betel chewing and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Cureus 2018;10:e2943.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Asghar MA, Iqbal J, Ahmed A, Khan MA, Shamsuddin ZA. Aflatoxin B1 in betel nuts (Areca catechu L.) imported to Pakistan from different regions of South Asia. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill 2014;7:176-81.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Bhowate RR, Lohe VK, Meshram MG, Dangore SB. Serum aflatoxin B1 antibody titer, percent hemolysis and transaminases in oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2021;25:110-7.  Back to cited text no. 39
  [Full text]  
40.
Liu Y, Wu F. Global burden of aflatoxin-induced hepatocellular carcinoma: A risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 2010;118:818-24.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Wild CP, Gong YY. Mycotoxins and human disease: A largely ignored global health issue. Carcinogenesis 2010;31:71-82.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Groopman JD, Kensler TW, Wild CP. Protective interventions to prevent aflatoxin-induced carcinogenesis in developing countries. Annu Rev Public Health 2008;29:187-203.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Wild CP, Montesano R. A model of interaction: Aflatoxins and hepatitis viruses in liver cancer aetiology and prevention. Cancer Lett 2009;286:22-8.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Gupta PC. Areca nut use in India. Indian J Med Sci 2007;61:317-9.  Back to cited text no. 44
  [Full text]  
45.
Satsangi S, Chawla YK. Viral hepatitis: Indian scenario. Med J Armed Forces India 2016;72:204-10.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Singh PK, Yadav A, Singh L, Mazumdar S, Sinha DN, Straif K, et al. Areca nut consumption with and without tobacco among the adult population: A nationally representative study from India. BMJ Open 2021;11:e043987.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Kumar A, Oswal K, Singh R, Kharodia N, Pradhan A, Sethuraman L, et al. Assessment of areca nut use, practice and dependency among people in Guwahati, Assam: A cross-sectional study. Ecancermedicalscience 2021;15:1198.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Paulino YC, Wilkens LR, Sotto PP, Franke AA, Kawamoto CT, Chennaux JS, et al. Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, superiority trial on areca nut/betel quid cessation: The Betel Nut Intervention Trial (BENIT). Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2020;17:100544.  Back to cited text no. 48
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,076 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed225    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded33    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007