ONLINE ONLY ARTICLES - CASE REPORT
|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 130
Incidental finding of orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst with unusual features
DB Nandini1, T Premlata Devi2, BS Deepak2, Ngairangbam Sanjeeta1
1 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Dental College, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India
|Date of Submission||04-May-2021|
|Date of Decision||03-Aug-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||25-Jan-2022|
|Date of Web Publication||31-Mar-2022|
D B Nandini
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Dental College, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst (OOC) is a rare developmental odontogenic cyst occurring in the jaw with debated etiology. It was originally believed to be a variant of odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) but is now considered to be a distinct entity. The majority of the cases occur in the third and fourth decades of life. The common site is the mandibular posterior region with a male predilection. Swelling is the most common symptom which may be accompanied by pain, although in most cases, the lesion is asymptomatic. These lesions mostly present as unilocular radiolucency often associated with an impacted tooth. They may mimic dentigerous cyst and OKC in radiologic and histopathologic presentation, however, differ in biological behavior, pathogenesis and prognosis in comparison. Hence, making an accurate diagnosis is essential. This article describes an incidental finding of OOC in a 28-year-old female during radiographic investigation for orthodontic treatment. This case showed some rare features such as multilocular radiolucency, nonkeratinized epithelium in areas of inflammation, few cholesterol clefts with giant cells, presence of dentinoid-like material and dystrophic calcification in the capsule.
Keywords: Calcification, dentinoid, differential diagnosis, etiology, histopathology, inflammation, orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst, radiographic features
|How to cite this article:|
Nandini D B, Devi T P, Deepak B S, Sanjeeta N. Incidental finding of orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst with unusual features. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2022;26:130
|How to cite this URL:|
Nandini D B, Devi T P, Deepak B S, Sanjeeta N. Incidental finding of orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst with unusual features. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 3];26:130. Available from: https://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2022/26/1/130/341387
| Introduction|| |
Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst (OOC) is a rare type of odontogenic cyst, which shows an orthokeratinized stratified squamous epithelium. It was originally considered as a type of odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) but later identified as separate entity. There are subtle histological differences between OOC and OKC which confirms the diagnosis. OOC radiographically mimics dentigerous cyst which can confound the final diagnosis. We report a case of OOC which was incidentally detected with multilocular appearance in radiograph and unique histopathology.
| Case Report|| |
A 28-year-old female patient came for orthodontic correction of malposed teeth. Routine radiographic examination was advised to evaluate the status of dentition. The orthopantomogram (OPG) revealed a well-defined multilocular radiolucency with a sclerotic border in the right molar ramus region of the mandible distal to the impacted third molar [Figure 1]. There was no other associated symptom such as swelling or pain clinically. The extraoral examination revealed no facial asymmetry. Blood investigations were normal. Fine-needle aspiration cytology was not contributory. Based on the clinical and radiographic evaluation, a preliminary diagnosis of an odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) or a benign odontogenic tumor was made. An excisional biopsy was performed with the extraction of the impacted tooth and the specimen was sent for histopathological examination.
|Figure 1: Orthopantomogram showing a well-defined multilocular radiolucency with sclerotic border in the right molar-ramus region of the mandible distal to the impacted third molar|
Click here to view
Gross examination of the specimen revealed a cystic lesion measuring about 2 cm × 3 cm × 2 cm in size and grayish . The cystic lumen was smooth and contained white cheesy material. The histopathologic examination of the tissue section revealed a cystic lesion with epithelial lining and fibrous connective tissue capsule [Figure 2]. The epithelium revealed thin, uniform orthokeratinized stratified squamous epithelium with a prominent granular cell layer with a flat basement membrane [Figure 3]a. Orthokeratin flakes were seen on the surface epithelium and in the cystic lumen. The basal cells were low cuboidal to flattened without nuclear palisading, hyperchromatism and reversal of polarity [Figure 3]b. The epithelium was nonkeratinized in few areas of inflammation [Figure 3]c. The fibrous capsule showed dense collagen bundles, few chronic inflammatory cells, cholesterol clefts and giant cells [Figure 4]a, hemosiderin pigments [Figure 4]b, dystrophic calcification [Figure 4]c and dentinoid-like material focally [Figure 4]d. This led to the confirmation of the diagnosis of orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst (OOC).
|Figure 2: A cystic lesion with epithelial lining and fibrous connective tissue capsule (H & E, ×4)|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: The epithelium revealed uniform orthokeratinized stratified squamous epithelium with a prominent granular cell layer (a: H & E, ×10). The surface showed sheaves of orthokeratin and keratin flakes were present in the cystic lumen. The basal cells were low cuboidal to flattened without nuclear palisading, hyperchromatism and reversal of polarity (b: H & E, ×20). Epithelium was nonkeratinized in few areas of inflammation (c: H & E, ×10)|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Fibrous capsule showed dense collagen bundles, few chronic inflammatory cells, cholesterol clefts and giant cells (a: H & E, ×10), hemosiderin pigments (b: H & E, ×10), dystrophic calcification (c: H & E, ×4) and dentinoid-like material focally (d: H & E, ×4)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The OOC is a rare developmental cyst of odontogenic origin. It was first described by Schultz in 1927 as a dermoid cyst. In 1945, Philipsen considered it as an orthokeratinized variant of OKC. In 1981, Wright defined it as a separate entity. In 2005, the WHO redefined OKC as a neoplasm and termed it as keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KCOT) while OOC was considered a separate entity., OOC differs in many aspects from the other developmental odontogenic cysts, especially dentigerous cyst and OKC.
The pathogenesis of OOC is still uncertain. Many origins are suggested such as cell rests of dental lamina, oral epithelium influenced by dental papilla and reduced enamel epithelium., The attachment of the cystic lining to the neck of the tooth prompted to contemplate the origin in reduced enamel epithelium. It was suggested that the reduced enamel epithelium surrounding the impacted tooth might keratinize under some stimulus owing to its pluripotent nature, thus forming a true dentigerous cyst with orthokeratinization. They also raised the possibility that OOC could be a central epidermoid cyst.
The precise incidence of OOC is not clear and complicated as they were first considered an orthokeratinized variant of OKC. They have previously been accounted for 10% of OKCs. There is conflicting documentation of occurrence ranging from 3% to 11% by some authors and 5.2%–16.8% by others. They make 1% of all odontogenic cysts. It represents 7%–17% of all the keratinizing jaw cysts.
OOCs are common in the third and fourth decades. Males are more commonly affected (2–2.5:1)., Dong et al. found a higher incidence among females (ratio 2.59:1). The mandible is affected twice more commonly than the maxilla. The molar and ramus region is the more commonly involved site. About 46.5%–75% of OOCs are associated with an impacted tooth, especially the third molars, which appear radiographically similar to the dentigerous cyst.
The majority of cases are asymptomatic and are often detected incidentally during radiographic investigation for other problems. Some may present as swelling with or without pain or mobility of teeth.,,, Rarely aggressive OOC reaching large size causing cortical expansion, malocclusion, facial asymmetry and paresthesia has been reported., The size might vary from <1 cm–7 cm.
OOCs are usually unilateral, however, few bilateral cases and cases with multiple cysts, cases occurring in siblings have also been reported., At present, however, there is no convincing evidence to link multiple OOCs to nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCC) or Gardner syndrome.,
Some rare forms of OOC include peripheral OOC, OOC histologically associated with calcifying odontogenic cyst, ameloblastoma, complex odontoma, squamous cell carcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, cuniculatum carcinoma and combined OOC and OKC in a patient with Gardner syndrome, heterotopic cartilage, dentinoid and bilateral OOC.,,,,,,,,,
Most cases appear as a well-circumscribed unilocular radiolucency and while multilocular radiolucencies are rarely seen as in the present case. They may be associated with an unerupted tooth or the tooth root without causing resorption. Some may displace the neighboring teeth and the inferior dental canal too. The cortical bone expansion rate is larger than that of OKC. Few reports of OOC mimicking periapical lesions have been reported. A systematic review, however, revealed that 48% of OOC presented as incidental findings, with a slightly lower percentage presenting with swelling (41%). The present case was also diagnosed incidentally during radiographic evaluation for orthodontic treatment. As many of the cases are incidental findings, careful assessment of all routine radiographs, especially OPGs, is essential to diagnose any unknown pathology. Nevertheless, OOC should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of radiolucencies associated with an impacted tooth.
OOC shows a cystic cavity lined by orthokeratinized stratified squamous epithelium. The epithelial lining is usually thin and uniform, 4–9 cell layers thick with a prominent granular cell layer. The basal layer is made up of low cuboidal to flattened cells without nuclear palisading or hyperchromatism and reversal of polarity. The orthokeratin in the luminal surface shows an “onion skin appearance” with sheaves of orthokeratin. The lining may be nonkeratinized in case of inflammation which was evident in the present case. A mild verrucous appearance of the surface epithelium has also been reported. The fibrous capsule is made up of collagenous fibrous connective tissue, usually with no inflammation. If the cyst is infected secondarily, few chronic inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes, foamy histiocytes, occasional cholesterol clefts and hemosiderin deposits may be seen. Dystrophic calcifications are reported rarely. Hyalinization with abundant areas of eosinophilic globular structures resembling dentinoid is also reported. These features have been reported in individual cases, however, the present case revealed most of these varied histologic features. Inflammation may obscure the histology and careful analysis of the noninflamed areas is required to arrive at an accurate diagnosis. The unusual histopathological findings such as lichenoid changes and basilar hyperplasia have been reported by some authors.
Immunohistochemistry and special stains
Reduced expression of all these markers of Ki-67 and syndecan-1 proliferative index, p63 and bcl-2., OOC does not show the activity of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) unlike OKC. OOC stains to cytokeratin 1, 2 and 10 and Loricin (LOR) suggesting a normal pattern of epithelial differentiation while OKC reacts to cytokeratin 4, 13, 17 and 19 showing immature keratinocytes and altered differentiation. The positive expression of K2 and LOR in OOC indicated that the cells are in a completely differentiated stage and thus not aggressive in behavior. OOC significantly differs from OKC not only in its lining epithelium but also in its proliferating kinetics, clinical and biologic behavior, immunohistochemical profile and prognosis [Table 1].
|Table 1: Difference between orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst and odontogenic keratocyst|
Click here to view
Significant differences in polarization color were demonstrated in the subepithelial zones between OKC (greenish-yellow birefringence) and OOC (yellow or orange-red birefringence suggesting mature collagen) by a study conducted by Manthapuri et al.
Radiographic differential diagnosis of OOC should include dentigerous cyst (cyst attached to the neck of the impacted tooth, unilocular and root resorption is often seen), paradental cyst (not associated with impacted tooth), OKC [Table 1], ameloblastoma (more often multilocular which often shows resorption of roots) and radicular cyst (seen as periapical radiolucency and the associated tooth is nonvital). The histologic examination gives a final diagnosis. The histologic differential diagnosis of OOC should include epidermoid cyst (usually a soft tissue lesion and intraosseous occurrence is rare) and OKC [Table 1].
Treatment and recurrence
Conservative surgical removal with complete enucleation and curettage is the treatment of choice. The cyst rarely shows recurrence after treatment. 2.2% recurrence rate is reported by Crowley et al., while 4% recurrence is reported by González et al. Chronic progression of recurrent OOC into squamous cell carcinoma is reported by Wu et al.
The malignant potential of the epithelial lining of OOC is debatable. Convincing evidence is lacking. Some suggested triggering factors include chronic inflammation, genetic mutations in exon 6 of the TP53 gene, or oncogenic viral effects. No role of human papillomavirus in OOCs was observed in a study conducted by Vera-Sierra et al.
| Conclusion|| |
OOC is a rare developmental odontogenic cyst. Although the histopathologic features are well defined, knowledge about the etiopathogenesis and clinical behavior is still lacking and yet to be explored at a molecular level. OOCs are common in males and usually show unilocular radiolucency. The present case was seen in a female patient and showed some rare features such as multilocular radiolucency, nonkeratinized epithelium in areas of inflammation, presence of cholesterol clefts, giant cells, dentinoid-like material and dystrophic calcification in the capsule. OOCs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of both unilocular and multilocular radiolucencies, especially in the molar-ramus region of the mandible. It is of utmost importance to differentiate OOC from OKC since the latter differs in its clinical behavior, treatment and prognosis. Further research is needed to explore the biological behavior of these cysts.
We thank and congratulate our student Priyanka Chhetri for presenting the case and winning first prize in National Oral Pathology UG Summit 2021.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initial s will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Schultz L. Cysts of maxilla and mandible. J Am Dent Assoc 1927;14:1395-402.
Philipsen HP. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor in pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. In: Barnes EL, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2005. p. 306-7.
Wright JM. The odontogenic keratocyst: Orthokeratinized variant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981;51:609-18.
Speight P, Fantasia J, Neville B. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst. In: El-Naggar AK, Chan JK, Grandis J, Takata T, Slootweg PJ, editors. WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours. 4th
ed. Lyon: IARC; 2017. p. 241.
González Galván Mdel C, García-García A, Anitua-Aldecoa E, Martinez-Conde Llamosas R, Aguirre-Urizar JM. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst: A report of three clinical cases. Case Rep Dent 2013;2013:672383.
Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Odontogenic cyst and tumors. In: Neville BW, editor. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 3rd
ed. New Delhi: Reed Elsevier India Private Limited; 2013. p. 683-8.
Zhao YF, Wei JX, Wang SP. Treatment of odontogenic keratocysts: A follow-up of 255 Chinese patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94:151-6.
Kotwaney S, Shetty P. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst: A milder variant of an odontogenic keratocyst. Univers Res J Dent 2013;3:101-3.
Vuhahula E, Nikai H, Ijuhin N, Ogawa I, Takata T, Koseki T, et al.
Jaw cysts with orthokeratinization: Analysis of 12 cases. J Oral Pathol Med 1993;22:35-40.
Li TJ, Kitano M, Chen XM, Itoh T, Kawashima K, Sugihara K, et al.
Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst: A clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 15 cases. Histopathology 1998;32:242-51.
Dong Q, Pan S, Sun LS, Li TJ. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst: A clinicopathologic study of 61 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010;134:271-5.
Yoshida H, Onizawa K, Yusa H. Squamous cell carcinoma arising in association with an orthokeratinized odontogenic keratocyst. Report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:647-51.
Sarkar S, Khursheed O, Bansal R, Burza WK. Aggressive orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst: A rare case report and review. J Adv Oral Res 2015;6:40-3.
Crane H, Da Forno P, Kyriakidou E, Speight PM, Hunter KD. Multiple orthokeratinized odontogenic cysts: A report of two cases and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol 2020;14:381-5.
Fonseca FP, Pontes HA, Pontes FS, de Carvalho PL, Sena-Filho M, Jorge J, et al.
Oral carcinoma cuniculatum: Two cases illustrative of a diagnostic challenge. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;116:457-63.
Aragaki T, Michi Y, Katsube K, Uzawa N, Okada N, Akashi T, et al.
Comprehensive keratin profiling reveals different histopathogenesis of keratocystic odontogenic tumor and orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst. Hum Pathol 2010;41:1718-25.
Pakchoian AJ, Mahdian M, Durschlag ME. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst: Case of a rare peripheral counterpart. J Calif Dent Assoc 2015;43:251-4.
de Fátima Bernardes V, de Lacerda JC, de Aguiar MC, Gomez RS. Calcifying odontogenic cyst associated with an orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst. Head Neck Pathol 2008;2:324-7.
Fregnani ER, da Cruz Perez DE, Soares FA, Alves FA. Synchronous ameloblastoma and orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst of the mandible. J Oral Pathol Med 2006;35:573-5.
Ide F, Saito I, Horie N, Shimoyama T. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst of the mandible with heterotopic cartilage. Head Neck Pathol 2009;3:150-2.
Kulkarni M, Kheur S, Agrawal T, Ingle Y. Orthokeratinizing odontogenic cyst of maxilla with complex odontoma. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2013;17:480.
] [Full text]
Argyris PP, Koutlas IG. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst with an associated keratocystic odontogenic tumor component and ghost cell keratinization and calcifications in a patient with gardner syndrome. Head Neck Pathol 2017;11:240-8.
Bajpai M, Pardhe N, Aroroa M, Chandolia B. Ortho keratinized odontogenic cyst with dentinoid formation. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2017;27:S110-1.
Chaisuparat R, Coletti D, Kolokythas A, Ord RA, Nikitakis NG. Primary intraosseous odontogenic carcinoma arising in an odontogenic cyst or de novo
: A clinicopathologic study of six new cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:194-200.
Wang X, Wei L, Li B, Li J, Li W, Wang F, et al.
Clinical and cone-beam computed tomography features of orthokeratinized odontogenic cysts and odontogenic keratocysts in the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;79:1255-61.
Silva Servato JP, Cardoso SV, Parreira da Silva MC, Cordeiro MS, Rogério de Faria P, Loyola AM. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cysts presenting as a periapical lesion: Report of a case and literature review. J Endod 2014;40:455-8.
Macdonald-Jankowski DS. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst: A systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:455-67.
Irani S, Dalband M. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst: An unusual histopathological presentation. Avicenna J Dent Res 2017;9:e26084.
Nadalin MR, Fregnani ER, Silva-Sousa YT, Perez DE. Syndecan-1 (CD138) and Ki-67 expression in odontogenic cystic lesions. Braz Dent J 2011;22:223-9.
Manthapuri S, Sanjeevareddygari S, Mantha H, Oruganti RV, Reddy S, Vamshi VR. Evaluation of biological behavior of odontogenic keratocyst and orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst using picrosirius red stain: A clinicopathological retrospective study. J NTR Univ Health Sci 2019;8:206-10.
Crowley TE, Kaugars GE, Gunsolley JC. Odontogenic keratocysts: A clinical and histologic comparison of the parakeratin and orthokeratin variants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:22-6.
Wu RY, Shao Z, Wu TF. Chronic progression of recurrent orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst into squamous cell carcinoma: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2019;7:1686-95.
Vera-Sirera B, Rubio-Martínez L, Forner-Navarro L, Vera-Sempere F. Orthokeratinized odontogenic cysts: A Spanish tertiary care centre study based on HPV DNA detection. Head Face Med 2018;14:10.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]