Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 161-165
 

Capacity of Candida species to produce acetaldehyde at various concentrations of alcohol


1 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth's, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Research, D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission03-Dec-2020
Date of Decision02-Jun-2021
Date of Acceptance22-May-2021
Date of Web Publication28-Jun-2022

Correspondence Address:
Mamatha G S Reddy
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_494_20

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Background: Along with tobacco use, alcohol consumption is one of the crucial factors for oral cancer. Acetaldehyde (ACH), a byproduct of alcohol, is reported as carcinogenic. One of the producers of ACH from alcohol is Candida species. The aim of the study was to quantify the ACH produced by Candida species at various concentrations of alcohol.
Materials and Methods: Clinical isolates of Candida, namely Candida albicans, Candida krusei and Candida tropicalis and C. albicans ATCC 18,804, were subjected to various concentrations of alcohol. Alcohol dehydrogenase and ACH were estimated using spectrophotometry and headspace gas chromatography, respectively.
Results: Out of all three clinical isolates, C. tropicalis produced more ACH (412.1 μM) at 10 mM alcohol concentration by 105 colony-forming unit/ml followed by C. albicans (233 μM) and C. krusei (53.7 μM). C. albicans of clinical isolate and ATCC species (222 μM) did not show much difference.
Conclusion: The study results conclude that Candida species are capable of producing carcinogenic levels of ACH on exposure to various concentrations of alcohol.


Keywords: Acetaldehyde, alcohol, Candida albicans, Candida species, oral cancer


How to cite this article:
Reddy MG, Kakodkar P, Nayanar G. Capacity of Candida species to produce acetaldehyde at various concentrations of alcohol. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2022;26:161-5

How to cite this URL:
Reddy MG, Kakodkar P, Nayanar G. Capacity of Candida species to produce acetaldehyde at various concentrations of alcohol. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 14];26:161-5. Available from: https://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2022/26/2/161/348763





   Introduction Top


Alcohol consumption is the main risk factor for oral and pharyngeal cancers, together with tobacco use.[1],[2],[3],[4] Although alcohol (ethanol) has been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a human carcinogen, there is no clear evidence of its association.[5],[6] Ethanol-associated carcinogenicity is due to the major oxidized metabolite called acetaldehyde (ACH).[7] Exposure to ACH over a period of time influences the cellular activity and triggers DNA modifications that may bring about mutations and cancer initiation.[8],[9]

Although it is thought that ethanol is mainly metabolized in the liver,[10] several studies in the literature have demonstrated elevated levels of ACH in saliva than those found in the blood soon after alcohol intake.[11],[12] Metabolism of ethanol to ACH in the oral cavity is a direct function of oral microbiome, associated metabolism, salivary glands and compromised oral hygiene along with several other nutritional, psychosocial and environmental factors.[13]

A direct correlation has been found between the levels of oral microbes (Streptococcus salivarius, hemolytic Streptococcus viridans var., Corynebacterium sp., Stomatococcus sp. and yeasts) and ACH levels in saliva. Candida species in particular have been associated with increased levels of ACH,[14] and this is mediated through the microbial enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH).

Previous studies have demonstrated the ACH production in oral cavity after alcohol consumption or use of alcohol-based mouthwashes and correlated with the bacterial analysis.[14],[15],[16] However, the detailed analysis of bacterial species with the quantification of ACH production was unclear. Limited studies have been published in particular with Candida species.[17]

Yeasts are the high producers of ACH from alcohol. ACH binds to cellular proteins and DNA, interferes with DNA synthesis and repair and leads to replication errors or mutations causing development of tumor. With this background, the present study made an attempt to correlate the alcohol dose-dependent ACH production by Candida species.


   Materials and Methods Top


This study was conducted after the approval by the Ethics Committee, D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, No: DYPV/EC/49/2016. Three clinically isolated strains of Candida, namely Candida albicans, Candida krusei and Candida tropicalis, from oral saliva samples were used along with C. albicans ATCC 18,804 as standard culture strain. Identification of the clinically isolated cultures was on the basis of colony morphology, microscopy and growth on chromogenic culture media. Antibiotic susceptibility of all cultures was tested. Cell density for further experiments for Candida standard strain along with clinical isolates was estimated by suspending colonies from pure culture in phosphate-buffered saline and optical density at 500 nm was adjusted spectrophotometrically. Dilution plating was used to verify the microbial concentration. Absorbance of 0.4 at 500 nm corresponds to 1 × 105 colony-forming unit (CFU)/ml; absorbance of 0.34 at 500 nm corresponds to 1 × 104 CFU/ml; absorbance of 0.28 at 500 nm corresponds to 1 × 103 CFU/ml; absorbance of 0.19 at 500 nm corresponds to 1 × 102 CFU/ml. Crude enzyme extract from the cells was prepared by ultrasonicating cells and taking supernatant after centrifugation. For estimation of ADH, the continuous spectrophotometric rate determination (A340, light path = 1 cm) assay was used. ACH levels in the reactions were tested by headspace gas chromatography. All enzyme activity was expressed as total activity 1.0 μmol of ethanol to ACH per min.


   Results Top


Three clinical isolates of Candida species, i.e., C. albicans, C. krusei, C. tropicalis and C. albicans ATCC 18,804, were assessed for their capability of converting various levels of alcohol to ACH at different time intervals. Clinical isolate of C. albicans produced more ACH when compared to C. albicans (ATCC). Out of three clinical isolates, C. tropicalis produced the highest ACH. At a particular concentration of alcohol, the concentration of ACH was increasing as the CFU/ml of the species was increasing by all the Candida species. Similarly, at particular CFU/ml of species, the ACH concentration was decreasing as the concentration of the alcohol increases for all the species. As the concentration of the alcohol increases, the ability of the C. albicans to produce ACH reduces. Beyond the level of 1000 mM, the organisms of the level 102–104 cannot produce ACH [Table 1]. C. albicans (clinical isolates) are able to produce ACH even with increasing concentration of alcohol, but the amount reduces significantly [Table 2]. C. krusei did not produce ACH from alcohol of concentration beyond 1000 mM [Table 3]. C. tropicalis was able to produce ACH irrespective of the alcohol concentration, but the amount of ACH reduced as the concentration increased and also as the concentration of the organism reduced. Production of ACH was inversely proportional to the alcohol concentration [Table 4].
Table 1: Acetaldehyde production (μM) at various concentrations of alcohol (mM) at different colony-forming unit/ml by Candida albicans (ATCC)

Click here to view
Table 2: Acetaldehyde production (μM) at various concentrations of alcohol (mM) at different colony-forming unit/ml by Candida albicans (clinical isolate)

Click here to view
Table 3: Acetaldehyde production (μM) at various concentrations of alcohol (mM) at different colony-forming unit/ml by Candida krusei (clinical isolate)

Click here to view
Table 4: Acetaldehyde production (μM) at various concentrations of alcohol (mM) at different colony-forming unit/ml by Candida tropicalis (clinical isolate)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The progression of cancer involves a series of steps, all of which are characterized by accumulation of genetic alterations followed by clonal evolution.[18] The well-recognized risk factors implicated in the pathogenesis of oral cancer are smoking, tobacco chewing as well as alcohol consumption.[19] Presumable role of microbes such as human papillomavirus, Epstein–Barr virus and C. albicans has also been substantiated.[20] Alcohol consumption has been regarded as an independent risk factor for cancer development irrespective of the type of beverage, pattern of drinking or tobacco use.[21] The exposure to alcohol in terms of both intensity and duration is associated with the risk of oral cancer development.

Alcohol is not the direct carcinogen, ACH which is its primary metabolite is known to be mutagenic. Apart from hepatic metabolism of alcohol to ACH, there is a good evidence of extrahepatic metabolism of alcohol to ACH in particular to occur in the oral cavity.[22] ACH is synthesized by mucosal aldehyde dehydrogenase 2; greater amounts are acquired from oral microflora-mediated microbial oxidation of ethanol through ADH-mediated carbohydrate fermentation.[14],[22],[23],[24],[25] Yeasts are common oral resident flora with ADH activity.[26] Therefore, they may constitute a significant part of ethanol-derived ACH.[27] Furthermore, earlier studies have shown ACH accumulation in oral tissues enhanced by differential expression of enzymes in the oral cavity.[22]

In the present study, at a particular CFU, the C. albicans both the clinical isolate and ATCC showed a maximum concentration of enzyme activity and ACH concentration at the lowest concentration of the alcohol. However, as the concentration of alcohol increases, the enzyme activity and ACH concentration decreases. Similar findings were observed with other Candida species found in the clinical isolates, i.e., C. krusei and C. tropicalis. This could be attributed firstly the enzyme activity of Candida species to convert alcohol to ACH which could be limited to a particular concentration of alcohol. As the concentration of alcohol increases, the enzyme released by Candida species may not be sufficient to convert alcohol to ACH. Secondly, the Candida species may not sustain in an environment of higher alcohol concentration. Isolated yeast, when incubated with 22 mM of ethanol in vitro for 60 min at 37°C, was capable of producing ACH and its production capacity was in proportion to the duration of incubation, the amount of yeast and the ethanol concentration (except a higher ethanol concentration, i.e., 2500 mM). A decrease in the production of ACH with increased ethanol concentrations was probably as a result of the death of viable yeasts. The difference in the production of ACH between species was about 180 fold, ranging from 1.3 nmol ach/106 CFU (C. parapsilosis IH 112765) to 236.4 nmol ach/106 CFUs (C. albicans IH 112344), with C. albicans accounting for 88% of all oral isolates (87% among the high and 90% among the low-producing saliva). Furthermore, three strains of Candida glabrata produced ACH of 13.6,14.1,15.4 nmol/106CFU and one strain of C. tropicalis was present with ACH production of 45.1 nmol/106CFU.[27] Our study demonstrated tropicalis as the highest ACH producer from oral isolates, which was in line with the study conducted by Nieminen et al. where they studied thirty non-C. albicans isolates and observed that C. tropicalis produced the highest (252.3 μM) amount of ACH followed by C. parapsilosis (243.3 μM) compared to C. albicans (235.1 μM) that was studied earlier and C. krusei on the other hand produced the lowest (54.6 μM).[17]

On incubation with ethanol (11 mM), all Candida species including Candida kefyr which was not earlier reported showed a significant amount of ACH production (>100 μM). C. kefyr produced the highest amount of ACH (299.3 ± 80.9 μM) from ethanol among all Candida species in contrast to the earlier reports which demonstrated C. tropicalis (248.9 ± 49.9 μM) to produce greater quantities of ACH.[17] Higher levels of ACH production were found in the isolates from patients who reported regular alcohol intake than those from nondrinkers. The amount of ACH produced by the strains isolated from oral squamous cell carcinoma patients during 30 min of incubation was greater (mean 716.6 lM) than that of the strains obtained from control group (mean of 654.0 lM).[28]

The ACH thus released accumulates in the oral mucosal cells and brings about changes in cellular and nuclear metabolisms leading to cytotoxicity. Many Candida species have been known to produce a mutagenic amount of ACH in the presence of ethanol.[17] The effects of ACH on the oral cavity can be local, and oral hygiene may be linked to the joint effect of smoking and alcohol intake on the incidence of oropharyngeal to local production of ACH by oral microflora and yeast infection which could partly explain cancers.[27] The presence of yeasts in the oral cavity has also been linked to epithelial dysplasia and oral carcinogenesis.[20],[29]


   Conclusion Top


Based on the results of the study, Candida species can produce ACH which can be carcinogenic and can affect cellular activity. Exposure to ACH for a longer period of time could cause DNA mutations even at physiological concentrations. Maintaining oral hygiene is of at most importance to reduce the bacterial/fungal load and also prevent alcohol consumption as alcohol can alone be a factor for cancer initiation.

Financial support and sponsorship

This research study was funded by D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune - 411018.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Doll R, Forman D, La Vecchia C, Woutersen R. Alcoholic beverages and cancers of the digestive tract and larynx. In: Macdonald IA, editor. Health Issues Related to Alcohol Consumption. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.; 1999. p. 351-93.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
La Vecchia C, Tavani A, Franceschi S, Levi F, Corrao G, Negri E. Epidemiology and prevention of oral cancer. Oral Oncol 1997;33:302-12.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bagnardi V, Blangiardo M, La Vecchia C, Corrao G. A meta-analysis of alcohol drinking and cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2001;85:1700-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Franceschi S, Talamini R, Barra S, Barón AE, Negri E, Bidoli E, et al. Smoking and drinking in relation to cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus in northern Italy. Cancer Res 1990;50:6502-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Alcohol Consumption and Ethyl Carbamate. Vol. 96. Lyon, France: IARC; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Balbo S, Juanes RC, Khariwala S, Baker EJ, Daunais JB, Grant KA. Increased levels of the acetaldehyde-derived DNA adduct N 2-ethyldeoxyguanosine in oral mucosa DNA from Rhesus monkeys exposed to alcohol. Mutagenesis 2016;31:553-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. A Review of Human Carcinogens. Vol. 100E. Lyon, France: IARC; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Seitz HK, Stickel F. Molecular mechanisms of alcohol-mediated carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:599-612.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Seitz HK, Becker P. Alcohol metabolism and cancer risk. Alcohol Res Health 2007;30:38-47.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Cederbaum AI. Alcohol metabolism. Clin Liver Dis 2012;16:667-85.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Yokoyama A, Tsutsumi E, Imazeki H, Suwa Y, Nakamura C, Mizukami T, et al. Salivary acetaldehyde concentration according to alcoholic beverage consumed and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 genotype. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2008;32:1607-14.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Yokoyama A, Tsutsumi E, Imazeki H, Suwa Y, Nakamura C, Yokoyama T. Polymorphisms of alcohol dehydrogenase-1B and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 and the blood and salivary ethanol and acetaldehyde concentrations of Japanese alcoholic men. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2010;34:1246-56.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Stornetta A, Valeria Guidolin V, Balbo S. Alcohol-derived acetaldehyde exposure in the oral cavity. Cancers 2018;10:1-27.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Homann N, Tillonen J, Meurman JH, Rintamäki H, Lindqvist C, Rautio M, et al. Increased salivary acetaldehyde levels in heavy drinkers and smokers: A microbiological approach to oral cavity cancer. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:663-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Homann N, Jousimies-Somer H, Jokelainen K, Heine R, Salaspuro M. High acetaldehyde levels in saliva after ethanol consumption: Methodological aspects and pathogenetic implications. Carcinogenesis 1997;18:1739-43.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Lachenmeier DW, Gumbel-Mako S, Sohnius EM, Keck-Wilhelm A, Kratz E, Mildau G. Salivary acetaldehyde increase due to alcohol-containing mouthwash use: A risk factor for oral cancer. Int J Cancer 2009;125:730-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Nieminen MT, Uittamo J, Salaspuro M, Rautemaa R. Acetaldehyde production from ethanol and glucose by non-Candida albicans yeasts in vitro. Oral Oncol 2009;45:e245-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tsantoulis PK, Kastrinakis NG, Tourvas AD, Laskaris G, Gorgoulis VG. Advances in the biology of oral cancer. Oral Oncol 2007;43:523-34.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ogden GR, Wight AJ. Aetiology of oral cancer: Alcohol. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;36:247-51.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
McCullough M, Jaber M, Barrett AW, Bain L, Speight PM, Porter SR. Oral yeast carriage correlates with presence of oral epithelial dysplasia. Oral Oncol 2002;38:391-3.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Maserejian NN, Joshipura KJ, Rosner BA, Giovannucci E, Zavras AI. Prospective study of alcohol consumption and risk of oral premalignant lesions in men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:774-81.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Dong YJ, Peng TK, Yin SJ. Expression and activities of class IV alcohol dehydrogenase and class III aldehyde dehydrogenase in human mouth. Alcohol 1996;13:257-62.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kurkivuori J, Salaspuro V, Kaihovaara P, Kari K, Rautemaa R, Grönroos L, et al. Acetaldehyde production from ethanol by oral streptococci. Oral Oncol 2007;43:181-6.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Miyakawa H, Baraona E, Chang JC, Lesser MD, Lieber CS. Oxidation of ethanol to acetaldehyde by bronchopulmonary washings: Role of bacteria. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1986;10:517-20.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Pikkarainen PH, Baraona E, Jauhonen P, Seitz HK, Lieber CS. Contribution of oropharynx microflora and of lung microsomes to acetaldehyde in expired air after alcohol ingestion. J Lab Clin Med 1981;97:631-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Reid MF, Fewson CA. Molecular characterization of microbial alcohol dehydrogenases. Crit Rev Microbiol 1994;20:13-56.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Tillonen J, Homann N, Rautio M, Jousimies-Somer H, Salaspuro M. Role of yeasts in the salivary acetaldehyde production from ethanol among risk groups for ethanol-associated oral cavity cancer. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999;23:1409-15.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Marttila E, Uittamo J, Rusanen P, Lindqvist C, Salaspuro M, Rautemaa R. Acetaldehyde production and microbial colonization in oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral lichenoid disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;116:61-8.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Mohd Bakri M, Mohd Hussaini H, Rachel Holmes A, David Cannon R, Mary Rich A. Revisiting the association between candidal infection and carcinoma, particularly oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Microbiol 2010;2:5780.  Back to cited text no. 29
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (780 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed108    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007